Showing posts with label genetics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label genetics. Show all posts

Monday, September 22, 2008

Where do you draw the line?

First, let me introduce myself. My name is Beth. I'm a friend of the creator of the Hunger Years blog. To my great excitement, Janelle requested that I contribute articles or ideas to this new blog. We're setting out on a serious endeavor here folks: to explore, research and document the world of food and how it affects all aspects of our lives. You'll most likely be hearing from me often. So let's get on with my first contribution.

Browsing food news, one can't help but notice the many headlines about genetically-modified food. Janelle has even commented on this in an earlier post. Some say this practice has great merit. This group often points to the practice of sending seeds or enriched flour to the hungry in third world countries. These seeds may be genetically modified to withstand drought or disease with the hopes of giving poor farmers more food. Enrich flour/corn is said to contain nutrients necessary for youngsters to develop normally. Detracters point to a plethora of environmental and medical risks, even ethical implications we can't even imagine at this point. For example, what if genetically-modified food affects our own genetics? What if these super-plants take over an area and kill off native flora/fauna that were necessary for that ecosystem (and the humans it supports) to survive?

Both sides of the debate have valid points, but what about a related field?*

An article in our 'Food in the News' section entitled "Orange juice laced with anchovies: Superfood or Monster from the deep?" outlines a burgeoning area of food sales known as nutraceuticals or enriched foods.

What exactly is an 'enriched food'? Since the 1940s, the food manufacturers have added nutrients to their food to help boost the health of those who eat it. In the 1940s, it was the discovery that you could add B vitamins to food that created this revolution. I distinctly remember as a milk-hating kid in the 1990s drinking Vitamin-D- and calcium-enriched orange juice. Now we think nothing of finding labels on our food that say "Enriched/Enhanced with ______" (see left) or seeing commercials about yogurt with added bacteria to help regulate our digestive system.

But what is the difference between refining fish oil (chock full of all those beneficial Omega-3 fatty acids) to add to orange juice and genetically modifying oranges to produce fish oil/omega-3s as they grow?

It's a serious question to add to the modified-foods debate. And one still open for a discussion of our very own. Where do you draw the line? What do you think about the pros/cons of genetically-modified foods or enriched foods? Is this sort of food actually healthy or is it a bad practice of the overly-competitive food industry?


*disclaimer: I'm purposely keeping my own opinion out of the contents of this post and will most likely comment later once I've decided what I actually feel about the ideas presented here.

Friday, September 19, 2008

What do you think of "Frankenstein" plants?




Personally, I do not like the idea of genetically modified foods. However, that is me looking at it from an environmental perspective, not an economic one. However, I think that sustainable development in different countries should remain just that- sustainable. I think that GM plant production could have long-term costs though it may look good to some now, economically speaking. However, if you are vegetarian I would suggest you be very cautious to avoid GM foods, as they often put genes of different in animals in DNA of plants to help them grow more efficiently. I'm not vegetarian anymore, but that's kinda weird.

Prince Charles is acutally vehemently against GM food

There is a very two-sided debate at hand here

BBC Quick Guide to GM Food

Read up on it and make up your own mind. What do you think of it? Do you think it will really help feed the hungry or mess up the environment?

On a very related note, there has been a recent television campaign to bring modified food back into peoples' good graces. With the marketing of the organic food movement, I guess those big companies invested in GM are losing a lot of dough.

There is this pro-high fructose corn syrup commercial, where this guy picnicing with his girlfriend refuses to eat a popsicle because of its high fructose corn syrup and the girl asks him what wrong it could do to him, and he can't answer. She then continues to say that its "just corn" and good for you in moderation and then this website comes up:

www.sweetsurprise.com

The website states that high fructose is the equal of every other sweetener, affirms its safety and talks of its "numerous benefits" which is mainly food preservation.

Anyways, I got a kick that they did not blatantly lie and say that it is healthy for you, but just that its as good as every other sweetener, and oh yeah, it won't kill you.